Week 3 - The Big Picture
Let me go back now to the Obergefell v.
Hodges case, and try to analyze some of the considerations given. First of all, I will not evaluate the
cultural, political and ideological reasons that are behind the authors of the
text, although I agree that intrinsically these are reasons enough to determine
the route of a decision.
In the beginning of the article, the
proponents affirm that the “The history of marriage is one of both continuity
and change. Changes, such as the decline of arranged marriages and the
abandonment of the law of coverture, have worked deep transformations in the
structure of marriage, affecting aspects of marriage once viewed as essential.”
Although I agree in part with the statement, watchful citizens can look further
and realized that this statement is only analyzing a certain period of time, a
couple of hundred years or so, but marriage is much older than that, it routed
since the beginning of human existence, and I believe that being so, at least
two analyses should had been made: the evolutionist and the creationism, since
could thus represent those that are God believers and those that are no
believers, so alleged changes should had been seen in the light of a big
picture, and not only with a small fragment of an enormous puzzle.

Comentários
Enviar um comentário