Week 3 - The transcendent purposes of marriage

Further, the Obergefell v. Hodges case article states that “It is demeaning to lock same-sex couples out of a central institution of the Nation’s society, for they too may aspire to the transcendent purposes of marriage.” This is, in my opinion, one of the most contradictory statement of the article. The right to aspire is obviously something inherent good and even sacred, for instance, I truly aspired, according to my beliefs to be together forever with my family, and with my Heavenly Father, but aspire, as I believe, must be inside of our realm of capacity and potential, for instance, even if I want to aspire to be a beautiful dark horse, I cannot, is far beyond the natural order of things. Aspire must be then something that must be intrinsic with the natural order of creation. Same-sex couples that aspire to the “transcendent purposes of marriage” as stated, are aspiring to something that is out of their chosen condition, marriage gained their transcendent position exactly by their men and women differences and complementarities, it survived millennials because of its importance in the equilibrium of societies and human beings, it was not same-sex marriage typology that made marriage purposes transcendent as stated in the article.
 I’m not saying with this that those that have same-sex attraction should not aspire to anything, it is not my purpose to judge aspirations, because aspirations are normally the fruit of what we desire and become.

Comentários

Mensagens populares deste blogue

week 5 - Who would want to spend an eternity with a companion for whom he/she has no friendship?

Week 7 - "But whosoever will lose his life for my sake, the same shall save it”

Week 4 - “I had loved before, but I knew not why."