Week 3 - The transcendent purposes of marriage
Further, the Obergefell v. Hodges case article
states that “It is demeaning to lock same-sex couples out of a central
institution of the Nation’s society, for they too may aspire to the
transcendent purposes of marriage.” This is, in my opinion, one of the most
contradictory statement of the article. The right to aspire is obviously
something inherent good and even sacred, for instance, I truly aspired,
according to my beliefs to be together forever with my family, and with my
Heavenly Father, but aspire, as I believe, must be inside of our realm of
capacity and potential, for instance, even if I want to aspire to be a
beautiful dark horse, I cannot, is far beyond the natural order of things.
Aspire must be then something that must be intrinsic with the natural order of
creation. Same-sex couples that aspire to the “transcendent purposes of
marriage” as stated, are aspiring to something that is out of their chosen
condition, marriage gained their transcendent position exactly by their men and
women differences and complementarities, it survived millennials because of its
importance in the equilibrium of societies and human beings, it was not
same-sex marriage typology that made marriage purposes transcendent as stated
in the article.

Comentários
Enviar um comentário